We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to cookies. Accept Learn more

ZERO HOURS JUSTICE
  • Home
  • HELP & HELPLINE
  • About Us
    • Our Purpose
    • Who we are
  • ZHJ IN THE NEWS
  • Blog
  • Useful Links
  • Client Stories
  • CONTACT

Blog

UK Lags behind australia in security for zero hours contract workers

7/12/2020

 
 By Pravin Jeyaraj
The purported benefit of zero hours contracts, including casual work and bank contracts, is that they offer flexibility to both employers and workers.

The employer only has to pay for work when there is actually work to be done. The worker has a choice on whether to take up offered work or not and has the right to work elsewhere without being fired. It sounds like a win-win scenario for everyone.
Picture
The coronavirus pandemic, however, has exposed a different reality. What Zero Hours Justice has found is that many casual workers have still had regular patterns and hours of work, as if they are permanent full-time or part-time employees, but without the same level of employment rights. When there was a shortage of staff and enough work to go around, the lack of a guarantee of work was less noticeable. In 2020, however, the government's strategy for tackling Covid-19 has lead to employers having to close down or reduce services for indeterminate periods of time. As a result, the lack of a guarantee of work has seen zero hours workers of all forms experience a drastic of loss of what had been regular income.
Many employers, but not all, have simply chosen to not furlough zero hours contract workers, even though individual employment situation would have made workers eligible to be furloughed. Often, the reason for not furloughing zero hours contract workers was the lack of any contractual right to pay for work not performed. On the face of it, this sounds like a reasonable position to take, until one takes into account that many zero hours contract workers may actually be working like full-time or part-time employees. Furthermore, they may also lose out on employment rights because the breaks in their regular working pattern mean they cannot claim to have continuous employment.  
Picture
The proposed reforms were introduced by Christian Porter MP, Australian Attorney-General and Minister for Industrial Relations
It is therefore good news to see that the Australian government has put forward legislation to make it compulsory for employers to offer permanent contracts to casual workers who have worked for them for a year and have been in regular shifts for six months. The proposals in the Fair Work Amendment (Supporting Australia's Jobs and Economic Recovery) Bill 2020 mirrors two of Zero Hours Justice own minimum requirements: 
  • The right to request a contract with more fixed hours at any time;
  • A duty on employers to review actual hours worked annually and providing a contract at or close to the hours actually being worked as soon as possible.​
Australia are just the latest in a line of countries with common law jurisdiction to attempt to significantly improve the lot of zero hours contract workers. In April 2017, zero hours contracts were effectively banned by New Zealand. Then, in 2018, on Christmas day, Ireland banned the use of zero hours contracts except in certain limited circumstances. A recent court ruling in South Africa, which has a hybrid legal system, found that amendments to the Labour Relations Act in 2015 meant zero hours contract workers could not be treated less favourably than permanent employees doing the same work. In this case, it was decided that not being guaranteed minimum hours was less favourable treatment. 
The United Kingdom, by comparison, has lagged behind its common law counterparts in the protection of zero hours contract workers. The most it has managed has been the banning of exclusivity clauses that zero hours contract workers from finding additional work when their main employer could not guarantee work. In 2019, it consulted on a number of reforms, including compensation for shifts cancelled at short notice and the requirement for a minimum notice period to cancelling shifts. The government appears to have forgotten about this consultation. If such a change in a law had been introduced, it would have made a big difference to the thousands of zero hours contract workers who suddenly lost work during the pandemic. But that would have been just the tip of the iceberg. More importantly, in the post-Brexit economic environment, how does the UK government hope to agree adequate free trade deals with other English-speaking countries when its protection of the most vulnerable workers appear to be weaker?

Comments are closed.

    contact

    For press enquiries or permission to reuse content, please contact:
    Pravin Jeyaraj, Communications Officer, [email protected]

    Images can be downloaded from here. Image of Julian Richer should be credited to Gerardo Jaconelli. 

    Archives

    August 2024
    June 2024
    January 2024
    July 2023
    May 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    November 2022
    October 2022
    August 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020

    CATEGORIES

    All
    Zero Hour Contract Scotland
    Zero Hours Contracts British Summer Time
    Zero Hours Contracts Daylight Saving Time
    Zero Hours Contracts Gender
    Zero Hours Contracts Local Authorities
    Zero Hours Contracts Local Councils
    Zero Hours Contracts NHS
    Zero Hours Contracts Public Sector
    Zero Hours Contracts Universities
    Zero Hours Contracts Women

    RSS Feed

Picture

    WANT TO HEAR MORE FROM US? PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS AND WE WILL KEEP YOU UP TO DATE WITH OCCASIONAL EMAIL BULLETINS 

Subscribe to Newsletter
Picture
Follow us on
Facebook &
​Twitter
Company No: 12417909  Registered Office: 38 Coney Street, York, Y01 9ND
Privacy & Cookie Policy
  • Home
  • HELP & HELPLINE
  • About Us
    • Our Purpose
    • Who we are
  • ZHJ IN THE NEWS
  • Blog
  • Useful Links
  • Client Stories
  • CONTACT